- 1952 - 1966 (Creation)
Level of description
Extent and medium
Name of creator
The Annual Review chronological series contains records on the annual defence review process.During the period 1952-1966, completing this annual review was one of NATO's primary tasks. The process developed and became one of the pillars constituting the Alliance's foundation for the development of its defence. The Annual Defence Review was at the core of the International Staff's activities for several years.In February 1952, the Council decided to carry out a comprehensive review each year of the requirements generated by the establishment and maintenance of a satisfactory defence posture based on actual performance capabilities from the political and economic standpoints. The Annual Review Committee was thus set up to supervise and co-ordinate all work in this area(1). One of the Annual Review's goals was to produce a clear presentation of the defence effort being made by each country. In July 1952, the first questionnaire entitled "Questionnaire adressé aux pays en vue de la réunion annuelle 1952 des besoins qu‘entraînent la création et l’entretien d’une puissance défensive" was finalized. Once adopted, it was circulated to the Member Nations. Replies were to be sent into the International Staff. Their review could thus begin.Over the years, the Annual Review was amended so as to streamline it and enhance its impact in the member states. In general, the documents pertaining to the Annual Review consisted of the following parts: - a preface and directives for preparing the memorandum; - three sections on the various forces: Army, Navy and Air Force; - an economic and financial section and annexes containing instructions on how to answer the questionnaire.By the early 1960s, the procedure to be followed for the Annual Review had become quite cumbersome. Too complicated, and seeking to address too many questions in detail, the Annual Review no longer fully met the goal assigned it. It proved inadequate as a means of pressure in the case of serious divergence between the requirements of NATO military authorities and the actual force contributions of member states. Beginning in 1959, the nations began to question its effectiveness. In January 1960, the Council tasked a Steering Group (AC/159) to look into whether changes might be made to the Annual Review in order to make it both simpler and more effective. In its report, the Group proposed that the Review no longer be carried out each year, but every three years instead. It would thus be possible, every three years, to reassess the defence programmes of the nations in the light of NATO's overall requirements. Because of the circumstances, this three-year procedure was never fully implemented.For the cycle commencing in 1962, the Annual Reviews dealt with the force requirements for 1962-1966. The work was carried out according to the following schedule: - 1962 - Triennial Review covering the force goals for 1963 and 1964 ; - 1963 - Interim Review covering the force goals for 1964; - 1964 - Annual Review covering the force goals for 1965; - 1965 - Interim Review covering the force goals for 1966; - 1966 - pending publication of the long-term force plans, the Annual Review for 1966 covered the force goals for 1967.Starting in 1963, the Annual/Triennial Review took a back seat to preparatory work for NATO long-term planning, which was decided upon at the Ottawa Ministerial. Under the new procedure, instead of focusing on the situation in each country, a horizontal approach to the consideration of problems was adopted. The Annual Review Committee was disbanded and, beginning in 1967, it was replaced by the Defence Review Committee(2).
Immediate source of acquisition or transfer
Content and structure area
Scope and content
The documents produced over the 15 years under consideration constitute a complete documentary history. They contain the material necessary to carry out a comprehensive study of the defence effort by the Alliance nations.
The Annual Review series contains questionnaires and replies by member nations, as well as analyses of the nations' replies. Also included are documents by the Committee in charge of reviewing questionnaire replies, working papers, OEEC reports, recommendations, planning directives and comments by SHAPE, SACLANT and ACCHAN on the nations' replies, final reports to the Council, records from the Steering Committee and documents by the Ad Hoc Committee for the review of the situation in the Federal Republic of Germany (1952). Documents
of a general nature (referenced ARQ(Year)General) which provide instructions for the preparation of replies contain forms and tables accompanied by administrative instructions, definitions and arrangements for the circulation of replies.
Appraisal, destruction and scheduling
System of arrangement
Annual Review series documents are assembled by type - ARQ (questionnaire), AR (IS documents), AR/countries (questionnaire replies), MEMMO/countries (OEEC Reports, 1952-1962), CM (final report to the Council), SER (SACLANT's comments on the replies and SACLANT planning directives), SHAPE (Comments by SHAPE on the replies and SHAPE planning directives), SC (Steering Committee documents 1953-1962), SGM (Final comments and recommendations by the Permanent Group 1959-1965), and then by year and number. However, also included are several references used occasionally or for a short period of time (e.g.: TR (Questionnaire replies - Triennial review in 1962), IR (Questionnaire replies - interim review in 1963), DFR (preliminary draft report), DSR (draft report), GEN WP (working papers)).
Conditions of access and use area
Conditions governing access
NATO publicly disclosed information is available for research and education purposes. Any commercial use requires the written permission of NATO. Please credit the NATO Archives should any documents be used for publication. Guidelines for the proper citation of NATO publicly disclosed information can be found on the NATO Archives website (http://www.nato.int/archives).
Conditions governing reproduction
Language of material
Script of material
Language and script notes
The questionnaires were circulated in both NATO official languages (English and French). The nations' replies, however, exist only
in the language in which they were originally drafted (English or French), usually English.
Physical characteristics and technical requirements
Allied materials area
Existence and location of originals
Existence and location of copies
Related units of description
(1) See the series under reference AC/19.
(2) See the series under references DRC, DPQ and DPC.
Subject access points
Place access points
Name access points
Genre access points
Description control area